Series 2 is currently being filmed.
Kevin Spacey brings a real and odd likeability to Underwood who is essentially a villain, we want to see him succeed, just so the plot can unfurl and more and more of the unwitting victims become ensnared and enslaved to his biding. Spacey really does give the character a lot of depth and his depiction of the Machiavellian Francis Underwood is a joy to watch.
The British version had a similar giant in Ian Richardson who was also sublime as Urquhart, both he and Spacey are Shakespearean actors and these are the kinds of roles where it really shows. However the casts in each series are not so comparable. The people at Netflix really put in the extra mile to weave together a cast that performed well individually and together Spacey is well complimented by accomplice and lover Kate Mara and on screen wife Robin Wright, whereas the British version was somewhat let down by actors in roles that were either to big for them to play or were poorly written. The British version was very much a one man band, that's not to say it wasn't a great one man show but too many scenes were far to camp or overplayed or indeed unconvincingly played such as the balcony scene in the last episode, whereas the Netflix version really does feel gritty and real, each character has been well thought out and the approach to taking a life is much more plausible and just as sinister.
One need only compare the interesting and tragic "Peter Russo" (Corey Stoll) with his equivalent in the British series the hard on his luck Irishman "Roger O'Neil" (Miles Anderson), to see the jump above the re-imagining has made. Russo's story is one people are able to access he has been given the background and exposure that O'Neil never had, and Underwood's actions are all at once horrific but at the same time startlingly easy to understand.
The US show has also tastefully transplanted specific scenes that further examine the difference between the two leads such as the euthanizing of the dog, watching both Richardson and Spacey in these situations as both Urquhart and Underwood respectively show how much change can be made by an actor to the same act. Richardson was a great deal weaker showing us his vulnerability whereas Spacey demonstrates exactly how menacing and cold blooded he really is even when breaking the 4th wall, cold to the core one might say. Both men however are experts in the art of convincing themselves of the morality and mercy of their acts, creating for themselves god-like pedestals, which in both cases works brilliantly.
However that does not mean to say that the original House of Cards was without merit, it has dated yes, and it is a one man show but it is a very good one. Both actors bring different qualities to their characters. Urquhart's aristocratic charms are compared with the on the surface likeability of Underwood's self-made-man of the people, both however are brilliant at showing their teeth revealing the shark in each man. It will be interesting to see if the Netflix adaptation follows the same pattern as the British in that the following series are renamed to correspond with the literature or whether, as with other adaptations such as Game of Thrones, no such change occurs. Either way the story is riveting and I cannot wait to see if Zoe Barnes has her "Mattie Storin" moment. I just hope its more convincing.
Ian Richardson as Urquhart
Spacey as Underwood